Skip to main content

Fitting Equivalents Reference

Every K-factor and L/D you need, plus a mini-calc that converts a fitting + diameter into ft and m of equivalent pipe.

Last reviewed

Equivalent-length mini-calc

Pick a fitting and a diameter — get the straight-pipe equivalent length immediately.

Equivalent length
5ft
1.524 m · L/D = 30
K-factor
0.75
Source: Crane TP-410

Fittings library

Filter by group or type a keyword.

FittingGroupKL/DSource
Elbow 90° standard (threaded)Elbows0.7530Crane TP-410
Elbow 90° long radiusElbows0.4520Crane TP-410
Elbow 45°Elbows0.3516Crane TP-410
Tee — flow through runTees0.420Crane TP-410
Tee — flow through branchTees1.860Crane TP-410
Gate valve fully openValves0.178Crane TP-410
Gate valve half openValves4.5200Crane TP-410
Globe valve fully openValves6340Crane TP-410
Ball valve fully openValves0.053Cameron Hydraulic Data
Check valve — swingValves2100Crane TP-410
Check valve — liftValves12.5600Crane TP-410
Butterfly valve fully openValves0.740Crane TP-410
Sudden expansion (1:2)Transitions0.5628Idel’chik (Borda–Carnot)
Sudden contraction (2:1)Transitions0.3417Idel’chik
Pipe entrance — sharp edgedEntry / Exit0.525Crane TP-410
Pipe entrance — roundedEntry / Exit0.053Crane TP-410
Pipe exit (to tank)Entry / Exit150Crane TP-410
Elbow 90° mitred (welded segments)Elbows1.260Crane TP-410
Plug valve fully openValves0.418Crane TP-410
Diaphragm valve fully openValves2.3115Crane TP-410
Foot valve with strainer (poppet disc)Valves1.475Crane TP-410
Angle valve fully openValves2145Crane TP-410
Eccentric reducer (suction-side, prevents air pocket)Transitions0.418Cameron Hydraulic Data
Concentric reducer (gradual, 30° taper)Transitions0.210Cameron Hydraulic Data
Y-strainer (clean basket)Meters / Strainers2.5125Manufacturer typical (clean); doubles when dirty
Orifice plate flow meter (β=0.6)Meters / Strainers4200ISO 5167 typical for β = 0.6

How this works

K-factor method: hm = K · v² / (2g) Equivalent length method: hm = f · (Leq/D) · v² / (2g) where Leq = (L/D) · D

Both methods are equivalent in the fully turbulent regime. The two-coefficient table here means you can use whichever method matches your existing calc. Don't apply both to the same fitting — you'd double count.

Method comparison
K-factorEquivalent length
Formh = K · v²/2gL_eq = (L/D)·D added to pipe length
Pipe-friction-factor sensitive?NoYes — depends on f
Best forHand calc on a single fittingWhen you already run Darcy-Weisbach on the pipe
Combine?Per fitting, not bothPer fitting, not both

Common questions

K-factor or equivalent length — which should I use?
Both are valid. K-factor (h = K · v² / 2g) is more accurate at large Reynolds where the loss is dominated by velocity head. Equivalent length (treat the fitting as more pipe of length L_eq) is convenient when you are already running Darcy-Weisbach. Most textbooks recommend not mixing them on the same fitting — pick one method per fitting.
Where do these numbers come from?
Crane Technical Paper TP-410 is the industry reference and the source of most values here. Cameron Hydraulic Data and Idel'chik provide cross-checks for transitions. Manufacturer Cv values are more accurate when available — they should override the table for safety-critical work.
Are these values valid for non-water fluids?
Yes for incompressible Newtonian fluids in the fully turbulent regime, where K and L/D become roughness-dominated. They are not strict for very viscous fluids in laminar regimes; for those cases, a more rigorous approach is needed.